TOP LIST Best ASP.NET Core 1.0 Hosting with Special Discount in 2017

TOP LIST Best ASP.NET Core 1.0 Hosting with Special Discount in 2017

CheapASPNETHostingReview.com | Best and cheap ASP.NET Core 1.0 hosting. we had come out a list of the best ASP.NET hosting, which are rated independently based on the ASP.NET frameworks, Microsoft control libraries, databases, Microsoft technical support, and web hosting price.

Web-hosting

To choose the best ASP.NET hosting for your ASP.NET websites, we recommend you going with the best ASP.NET hosting as following. You won’t go wrong with them that all of the best ASP.NET hosting services have been truly tested by our ASP.NET developers.

Basic
Rank1234
Rating5.0 of 55.0 of 54.0 of 54.0 of 5
Customer301 votes186 votes75 votes100 votes
Regular $4.49/mo

15% OFF

 €3.49/Mo

15% OFF

$3.99/mo

35% OFF

£2.99/mo

35% OFF

Discount$3.81/mo€2.97/Mo$2.59/mo£1.95/mo
Basic
OS2016 R22014 R22012 R22012 R2
Control PanelPleskPleskPleskPlesk
Free DomainNoNoNoNo
BackupWeeklyDailyWeeklyWeekly
SSDyesyesyes
DomainUnlimited50
Hosting SitesUnlimitedUnlimited
Bandwidth60 GBUnlimited50 GB50 GB
Disk Space5 GBUnlimited10 GB5 GB
Shared SSLYesYesYesYes
Programming
ClassicASPYesYesYesYes
.NET Frameworks2.0/3.5SP1/4.5/5/core2.0/3.5SP1/4.0/4.5/5/core2.0/3.5SP1/4.5/5/core2.0/3.5SP1/4.5/5/core
ASP.NET MVC2/3/4/5/61/2/3/4/5/62/3/4/5/62/3/4/5/6
Silverlight4/54/54/54/5
SQL Server2016201620162016
MySQL3222
Remote IISYesYesNoYes
Trust LevelFullFullFullFull
Dedicated App PoolYesYesYesYes
WebMatrixYesYesYesYes
URLRewriteYesYesYesYes
GZip
Schedule JobsYesYesYesYes
Support
Service LevelProfessionalProfessionalProfessionalProfessional
24×7 SupportYesYesYesYes
Full trustYesYesYesYes
EmailYesYesYesYes

The Best ASP.NET Core 1.0 Hosting in 2017

ASPHostPortal is a web hosting provider known for its professional ASP.NET hosting plans which are able to meet the demands of nearly all-sized businesses. Over the past 10 years since its reception, ASPHostportal has gained respect from both the developer and business communities.

The ASPHostportal ASP.NET hosting packages all comes with ASP.NET v2/v3.5/v4.6, ASP.NET core 1.0 and supports most versions of the frameworks including MVC, LINQ, AJAX and Silverlight. Also, they allow Full Trust to make sure that ASP.NET websites can run perfectly without the bother of the codes that cannot run. Right now, using this exclusive coupon link for checking out, the Basic hosting plan is $3.81/mo only, 15% off $4.49/mo you get originally.

The customers’ hosting experience is guaranteed by ASPHostportal excellent technical support team which is very helpful, knowledgeable and responsive to phone calls, emails and live chat. In addition, they offer every account with 30 days full money back and anytime post-rate money back guarantee. That makes customers’ ASP.NET hosting risk-free.

ASPHostPortal Statistik Review

sts

To learn more about ASPHostPortal, visit http://asphostportal.com

Why They’re the Best ASP.NET Core 1.0 Hosting

The following 5 checkpoints are main criterias on rating ASP.NET web hosting besides the consideration on the generic Windows web hosting features.

  1. Windows OS: the latest version of Windows OS is the key point of a quality ASP.NET hosting solution. And now, the best choices are Windows Server 2012R2, Windows Server 2012 and Windows Server 2008R2. In fact, all the recommended hosting companies support the mentioned Windows operating systems.
  2. ASP.NET Frameworks: as ASP.NET websites have to run in the corresponding .NET framework, it’s better that the web host can support most of frameworks from v1.1 to v4.0. In this case that you can have maximum flexibility for you websites and keep the possibility upgrading to the higher version.
  3. ASP.NET Trust Level: it’s configured for each website by .net infrastructure. you should know the exact configuration before the payment. in our research, 70% websites can be run only under the fully trust level. if your hosting company doesn’t tell that they support fully trust, you should be careful that your website may not run correctly in the host finally. surely, you can ask for money back but it’s time wasting.
  4. RAM: this is the maximum memory in the server that can be used for your site, which is configured in IIS application pool. Only sufficient RAM allocation can bring the website a reliable hosting condition.
  5. MSSQL Edition: MSSQL makes a big difference to store all data from the website, which is a Windows based database. Note that, the latest version of MSSQL is the SQL Server 2012.
  6. Control Panel: Plesk is the best reliable control panel for asp.net web hostingl and easy-to-use.
  7. Add-on Features: the installation required third party libraries are important when your website depends on then. E.G. Chat controls library, Altas library and more.
  8. knowledge of Microsoft technology support: you can easily call the technical support of the web host and ask some technical questions about ASP.NET website configuration and deployment. This is certainly important especially when you have a problem in the future.
Cheap ASP.NET Core 1.0 Hosting Tutorial – Tips to Send Emails in ASP.NET Core 1.0

Cheap ASP.NET Core 1.0 Hosting Tutorial – Tips to Send Emails in ASP.NET Core 1.0

CheapASPNETHostingReview.com | Cheap and reliable ASP.NET core 1.0 Hosting. ASP.NET Core 1.0 is a reboot of the ASP.NET framework which can target the traditional full .NET framework or the new .NET Core framework. Together ASP.NET Core and .NET Core have been designed to work cross platform and have a lighter, faster footprint compared to the current full .NET framework. Many of the .NET Core APIs are the same as they are in the full framework and the team have worked hard to try and keep things reasonably similar where it makes sense and is practical to do so. However, as a consequence of developing a smaller, more modular framework of dependant libraries and most significantly making the move to support cross platform development and hosting; some of libraries have been lost. Take a look at this post from Immo Landwerth which describes the changes in more detail and discusses considerations for porting existing applications to .NET Core.

ahpnet51

As with most coding challenges I jumped straight onto Google to see who else had had this requirement and how they solved the problem. However I didn’t find as many documented solutions that helped me as I was expecting to. Eventually I landed on this issue within the corefx repo on Github. That led me onto the MailKit library maintained by Jeffrey Stedfast and it turned out to be a great solution for me as it has recently been updated to work on .NET Core.

In this post I will take you through how I got this working for the two scenarios I needed to tackle. Firstly sending mail directly via an SMTP relay and secondly the possibility to save the email message into an SMTP pickup folder. Both turned out to be pretty painless to get going.

Adding MailKit to your Project

The first step is to add the reference to the NuGet package for MailKit. I now prefer to use the project.json file directly to setup my dependencies. You’ll need to add the MailKit library – which is at version 1.3.0-beta6 at the time of writing this post – to your dependencies section in the project.json file.

On a vanilla ASP.NET Core web application your dependencies should look like this:

test

Once you save the change VS should trigger a restore of the necessary NuGet packages and their dependencies.

Sending email via a SMTP server

I tested this solution in a default ASP.NET Core web application project which already includes an IEmailSender interface and a class AuthMessageSender which just needs implementing. It was an obvious choice for me to test the implementation using this class as DI is already hooked up for it. For this post I’ll show the bare bones code needed to get started with sending emails via an SMTP server.

To follow along, open up the MessageServices.cs file in your web application project.

We need three using statements at the top of the file.

using MailKit.Net.Smtp;
using MimeKit;
using MailKit.Security;

The SendEmailAsync method can now be updated as follows:

First we declare a new MimeMessage object which will represent the email message we will be sending. We can then set some of it’s basic properties.

The MimeMessage has a “from” address list and a “to” address list that we can populate with our sender and recipient(s). For this example I’ve added a single new MailboxAddress for each. The basic constructor for the MailboxAddress takes in a display name and the email address for the mailbox. In my case the “to” mailbox takes the address which is passed into the SendEmailAsync method by the caller.

We then add the subject string to the email message object and then define the body. There are a couple of ways to build up the message body but for now I’ve used a simple approach to populate the plain text part using the message passed into the SendEmailAsync method. We could also populate a Html body for the message if required.

That leaves us with a very simple email message object, just enough to form a proof of concept here. The final step is to send the message and to do that we use a SmtpClient. Note that this isn’t the SmtpClient from system.net.mail, it is part of the MailKit library.

We create an instance of the SmtpClient wrapped with a using statement to ensure that it is disposed of when we’re done with it. We don’t want to keep connections open to the SMTP server once we’ve sent our email. You can if required (and I have done in my code) set the LocalDomain used when communicating with the SMTP server. This will be presented as the origin of the emails. In my case I needed to supply the domain so that our internal testing SMTP server would accept and relay my emails.

We then asynchronously connect to the SMTP server. The ConnectAsync method can take just the uri of the SMTP server or as I’ve done here be overloaded with a port and SSL option. For my case when testing with our local test SMTP server no SSL was required so I specified this explicitly to make it work.

Finally we can send the message asynchronously and then close the connection. At this point the email should have been fired off via the SMTP server.

Sending email via a SMTP pickup folder

As I mentioned earlier I also had a requirement to drop a message into a SMTP pickup folder running on the web server rather than sending it directly through the SMTP server connection. There may well be a better way to do this (I got it working in my test so didn’t dig any deeper) but what I ended up doing was as follows:

The only real difference from my earlier code was the removal of the use of SmtpClient. Instead, after generating my email message object I create a steamwriter which creates a text file on a local directory. I then used the MimeMessage.WriteTo method passing in the base stream so that the RFC822 email message file is created in my pickup directory. This is picked up and sent via the smtp system.

Summing Up

MailKit seems like a great library and it’s solved my immediate requirements. There are indications that the Microsoft team will be working on porting their own SmtpClient to support ASP.NET Core at some stage but it’s great that the community have solved the problem for those adopting / testing .NET Core now.