Cheap Windows ASP.NET Core 1.0 Hosting with Best Service

Cheap Windows ASP.NET Core 1.0 Hosting with Best Service | Cheap and reliable Windows ASP.NET Core 1.0 hosting. Nowdays finding the best and cheap ASP.NET hosting provider is not easy at all, its really crucial for your web application. May your ASP.NET can only run smooth if it will be hosted on server which can provide you with a higher uptime and so on. But you know, there’s a thousand web hosting provider’s which offer ASP.NET hosting.

How to find The Best and Cheap Windows ASP.NET Hosting ?

I’m sure this question always be in your mind. Choosing and finding the best and cheap ASP.NET hosting provider is a time consuming task, to make your buying decision easy you can read review first and compare it after that you can conclude 2 best yet cheap ASP.NET hosting which are reliable and offer affordable ASP.NET Hosting so that everyone can afford it.

Cheap Windows ASP.NET Core 1.0 Hosting Recommendation

After review and compared 50 + more ASP.NET hosting provider we found 2 the Best and Cheap ASP.NET hosting company.

In order to make right and inform decisions when looking for a suitable windows ASP.NET hosting Service that will be relevan with your needs, here our recommendation of Best and Cheap ASP.NET Core 1.0 hosting providers.

ASP.NET Core 1.0
Host Unlimited Sites
5 GB Disk Space
60 GB Bandwidth
2 SQL Server db
SQL Server 2008/2012/2014
SQL Server 2016
200 MB SQL Server / db
3 MySQL db
200 MB MySQL /db
200 MB Email Space
Sign Up
ASP.NET Core 1.0
Unlimited Domain
Unlimited Disk Space
Unlimited Bandwidth
500 MB MSSQL Space/DB
MSSQL 2008/2012/2014
MSSQL 2016
500 MB MySQL Space/DB
500 MB Email Space
Sign Up

MOST HIGHLY RECOMMENDED ” We highly recommended ASPHostPortal to host your ASP.NET Core 1.0 hosting. is offer reliable and affordable windows ASP.NET hosting service, they have four plans, Host Intro, Host one , Host Two anda Host Three. The price starting from $1.00/mo – $14.00/mo. You can buying ASPHostPortal Windows ASP.NET Core 1.0 hosting plan for as low as $1.00/month also you can get FREE Cloud Hosting click here

When someone start to searching on internet about the best and cheap ASP.NET hosting provider , I’m sure in the end you can getting confused with web hosting price, feature, service,  server location, support and may things.

Who we are ?

We write review to help bloggers, web masters and beginners who desire to choosing a quality , affordable and excellent web hosting package. We write some detailed review, tips and tutorials in order to help you successfully create and manage your web hosting account also help you to choose the best yet cheap ASP.NET hosting which are reliable and offer affordable ASP.NET Hosting so that everyone can afford it.

How Should you choose the Best and Cheap ASP.NET Core 1.0 hosting ?

Your application runs smooth when you choose a good quality ASP.NET hosting provided. The best web hosting is one which can offer you with a quality web hosting service 99.99% uptime, high bandwidht, plenty of server space, 24/7 costumer support and money back guarantee. You can following this point while choosing the best and cheap ASP.NET hosting company for your website.

  • 99.99% Server Uptime
  • 24/7 Email and chat
  • Unlimited or a Decent Disk Space
  • Plesk Control Panel
  • Affordable Pricing
  • Unlimited Bandwidth
  • Full trust
  • Website Builder
  • Free Website Templates
  • Money back guarantee
  • A Good Rating by Customers


cropped-cheapaspnethr-1 is a proffesional web hosting review website to help people find the best web hosting at the lowest price available.We receive conpensation from web hosting compoanies whose products we review. We’re unbiased while review the web hosting so that you can take a right decision but still we encourage you to scrutinize the companies listed on this website



Cheap ASP.NET Core 1.0 Hosting Tutorial – Tips to Send Emails in ASP.NET Core 1.0

Cheap ASP.NET Core 1.0 Hosting Tutorial – Tips to Send Emails in ASP.NET Core 1.0 | Cheap and reliable ASP.NET core 1.0 Hosting. ASP.NET Core 1.0 is a reboot of the ASP.NET framework which can target the traditional full .NET framework or the new .NET Core framework. Together ASP.NET Core and .NET Core have been designed to work cross platform and have a lighter, faster footprint compared to the current full .NET framework. Many of the .NET Core APIs are the same as they are in the full framework and the team have worked hard to try and keep things reasonably similar where it makes sense and is practical to do so. However, as a consequence of developing a smaller, more modular framework of dependant libraries and most significantly making the move to support cross platform development and hosting; some of libraries have been lost. Take a look at this post from Immo Landwerth which describes the changes in more detail and discusses considerations for porting existing applications to .NET Core.


As with most coding challenges I jumped straight onto Google to see who else had had this requirement and how they solved the problem. However I didn’t find as many documented solutions that helped me as I was expecting to. Eventually I landed on this issue within the corefx repo on Github. That led me onto the MailKit library maintained by Jeffrey Stedfast and it turned out to be a great solution for me as it has recently been updated to work on .NET Core.

In this post I will take you through how I got this working for the two scenarios I needed to tackle. Firstly sending mail directly via an SMTP relay and secondly the possibility to save the email message into an SMTP pickup folder. Both turned out to be pretty painless to get going.

Adding MailKit to your Project

The first step is to add the reference to the NuGet package for MailKit. I now prefer to use the project.json file directly to setup my dependencies. You’ll need to add the MailKit library – which is at version 1.3.0-beta6 at the time of writing this post – to your dependencies section in the project.json file.

On a vanilla ASP.NET Core web application your dependencies should look like this:


Once you save the change VS should trigger a restore of the necessary NuGet packages and their dependencies.

Sending email via a SMTP server

I tested this solution in a default ASP.NET Core web application project which already includes an IEmailSender interface and a class AuthMessageSender which just needs implementing. It was an obvious choice for me to test the implementation using this class as DI is already hooked up for it. For this post I’ll show the bare bones code needed to get started with sending emails via an SMTP server.

To follow along, open up the MessageServices.cs file in your web application project.

We need three using statements at the top of the file.

using MailKit.Net.Smtp;
using MimeKit;
using MailKit.Security;

The SendEmailAsync method can now be updated as follows:

First we declare a new MimeMessage object which will represent the email message we will be sending. We can then set some of it’s basic properties.

The MimeMessage has a “from” address list and a “to” address list that we can populate with our sender and recipient(s). For this example I’ve added a single new MailboxAddress for each. The basic constructor for the MailboxAddress takes in a display name and the email address for the mailbox. In my case the “to” mailbox takes the address which is passed into the SendEmailAsync method by the caller.

We then add the subject string to the email message object and then define the body. There are a couple of ways to build up the message body but for now I’ve used a simple approach to populate the plain text part using the message passed into the SendEmailAsync method. We could also populate a Html body for the message if required.

That leaves us with a very simple email message object, just enough to form a proof of concept here. The final step is to send the message and to do that we use a SmtpClient. Note that this isn’t the SmtpClient from, it is part of the MailKit library.

We create an instance of the SmtpClient wrapped with a using statement to ensure that it is disposed of when we’re done with it. We don’t want to keep connections open to the SMTP server once we’ve sent our email. You can if required (and I have done in my code) set the LocalDomain used when communicating with the SMTP server. This will be presented as the origin of the emails. In my case I needed to supply the domain so that our internal testing SMTP server would accept and relay my emails.

We then asynchronously connect to the SMTP server. The ConnectAsync method can take just the uri of the SMTP server or as I’ve done here be overloaded with a port and SSL option. For my case when testing with our local test SMTP server no SSL was required so I specified this explicitly to make it work.

Finally we can send the message asynchronously and then close the connection. At this point the email should have been fired off via the SMTP server.

Sending email via a SMTP pickup folder

As I mentioned earlier I also had a requirement to drop a message into a SMTP pickup folder running on the web server rather than sending it directly through the SMTP server connection. There may well be a better way to do this (I got it working in my test so didn’t dig any deeper) but what I ended up doing was as follows:

The only real difference from my earlier code was the removal of the use of SmtpClient. Instead, after generating my email message object I create a steamwriter which creates a text file on a local directory. I then used the MimeMessage.WriteTo method passing in the base stream so that the RFC822 email message file is created in my pickup directory. This is picked up and sent via the smtp system.

Summing Up

MailKit seems like a great library and it’s solved my immediate requirements. There are indications that the Microsoft team will be working on porting their own SmtpClient to support ASP.NET Core at some stage but it’s great that the community have solved the problem for those adopting / testing .NET Core now.

Cheap ASP.NET Core 1.0 Hosting Choice

Cheap ASP.NET Core 1.0 Hosting Choice | Cheap and reliable ASP.NET Core 1.0 Hosting.  ASPHostPortal , HostForLIFE and DiscountService are recommended as the top 3 cheap ASP.NET core 1.0 hosting providers based on our reviews. They have exceeded their competitors not only on ASP.NET pricing, but also on features, reliability, speed and customer support. Going with them, customers can build up a Windows-based website easily at an affordable price.

To make things clean and simple, we have made out the following straightforward table of those three hosting companies from some of the referred aspects, including price, extras, hosting features and customer support. More details are presented as below.

Cheap ASP.NET Core 1.0 Hosting Choice


  • Windows 2012/IIS8.5
  • Unlimited Sites
  • Plesk panel
  • MSSQL 2012 Express
  • ASP.NET Core 1.0, MVC, Silverlight, URLRewrite2, WebMatrix
  • 30 Days Money Back Guaranted
To learn more, visit$€3.00/mo
  • Windows 2012 R2/IIS 8.5
  • MSSQL 2012 Express
  • Full trust level
  • Remote IIS & MSSQL
  • ASP.NET core 1.0, MVC, Silverlight, URLRewrite2, WebMatrix
  • Microsoft certificated 24×7 technical support
To learn more, visit$7.00/mo
  • Windows 2012/IIS8.0
  • Customized CP
  • MSSQL 2012 Express
  • 30 day money back
  • FULL trusted hosting
  • Isolated application pool
  • ASP.NET core 1.0 , MVC 4/5, Silverlight 4/5
To learn more, visit

Best Cheap ASP.NET Core 1.0 Hosting delivers essentially the most technologically sophisticated hosting options obtainable to clients across the planet. Safety, reliability, and functionality are in the core of their hosting operations to ensure every single web site and/or application hosted on servers is extremely secured and performs at optimum level.

They have more than 10 years combined knowledge with.NET, PHP, Network Administration, Technique Integration and related technologies to support mission vital hosting for applications constructed on these platforms. Their service is trusted worldwide and have served far more than 10,000 buyers in five different continents.

Causes Why Consumers Trust Their Site at

  • Excellent Uptime Price
    Their essential strength in delivering the service to you is always to sustain server uptime price. They never ever ever pleased to find out your website goes down and truly realize that it’ll hurt your onlines enterprise. In case your service is down, it’ll certainly become their pain and can certainly try to find the best pill to kill the discomfort ASAP.
  • Uptime & Support Guarantees
    They are so confident in hosting services, they will not only provide you with a 30 days money back guarantee, but also give you a 99.9% uptime guarantee.
  • A Powerful User-Friendly Control Panel
    Their Control Panel provides the tools and utilities, which give you true control over your account and web pages.
  • Setup Installation
    They’ll get you up and running within 30 seconds of placing your order.

Personal ASP.NET Hosting

hostforlifeblue-01-e1429238744490-300x150 is offering a free ASP.NET Core 1.0 hosting for all Windows shared hosting. For their cheap plan is only from €3.00 a month with incredible features and outstanding support. One click Script installer to install all your favorite ASP, PHP and Javascript/Ajax scripts. Daily backup also included with all shared hosting packages. Their robust, shared hosting plan with super speed and adequate allocated resources. Very suitable for individuals, college students and businesses which need good response time without compromising quality. For their paid service, They also give you Uptime and 30 Days money back guarantee.

Experienced ASP.NET Hosting

logo_ds2-e1429238788294-300x103 guarantees the highest top quality solution, prime safety, and unshakeable reliability. We carefully chose high-quality servers, networking, and infrastructure gear to make sure the utmost reliability.

They focus on offering cost-effective Windows shared hosting. That’s all they do and which is all they’ll ever do. Their new Windows 2008 / Windows 2012 hosting platform is excellent for the ASP.NET hosting needs and in case you’ll need support on Windows 2003 Hosting Platform, they still support it!

With their completely support on Microsoft Windows and ASP.NET, they’re the top option to host your MojoPortal Hosting. The following are a few of the causes why clients choose them as ASP.NET core 1.0 Hosting provider:

  • World Class Control Panel
    They use Globe Class Plesk Control Panel that help one-click installation.
  • Quickly and Safe Server
    The minimal specs of their servers involves Intel Xeon Dual Core Processor, RAID-10 protected hard disk space with minimum eight GB RAM. You dont want to worry regarding the speed of one’s web site.
  • Amazing Assistance Team
    Their support team is extremely fast and may help you with establishing and employing ASP.NET Core 1.0 hosting on your account

Cheap ASP.NET Core 1.0 ( ASP.NET 5 ) why it will replace Classic ASP.NET

Cheap ASP.NET Core 1.0 ( ASP.NET 5 ) why it will replace Classic ASP.NET | Cheap and Relibale ASP.NET Core 1.0 ( ASP.NET 5 ) hosting. ASP.NET Core 1.0 is not a continuation of ASP.NET 4.6. It is a whole new framework, a side-by-side project which happily lives alongside everything else we know. It is an actual re-write of the current ASP.NET 4.6 framework, but much smaller and a lot more modular.

Only recently Scott Hanselman announced the final name will be ASP.NET Core 1.0 after we’ve got to know it under ASP.NET 5, ASP.NET vNext and Project K.

Some people claim that many things remain the same, but this is not entirely true. Those people mostly refer to MVC 6 which is a whole separate framework which can be plugged into ASP.NET, but doesn’t have to. While MVC 6 remains very familiar, ASP.NET Core 1.0 is a big fundamental change to the ASP.NET landscape.

If you are a follower of the live community standups then you might have heard Damian Edwards saying how the team gets a lot of pressure (from above) to get an RTM out of the door. I am not surprised and can understand why ASP.NET Core 1.0 is strategically so important to Microsoft. It is probably a lot more vital to the future of .NET than we might think of it today.

ASP.NET Core 1.0 – What has changed?

A better question would be what has not changed. ASP.NET Core 1.0 is a complete re-write. There is no System.Web anymore and everything which came with it.

ASP.NET Core 1.0 is open source. It is also cross platform. Microsoft invests a lot of money and effort into making it truly cross platform portable. This means there is a new CoreCLR which is an alternative to Mono now. You can develop, build and run an ASP.NET Core 1.0 application either on Mono or the CoreCLR on a Mac, Linux or Windows machine. This also means that Windows technologies such as PowerShell are abandoned from ASP.NET Core 1.0. Instead Microsoft heavily integrates Node.js which can be utilized to run pre- and post build events with Grunt or Gulp.

It is also the reason why things like the .csproj file got replaced by the project.json file and why all the new framework libraries ship as NuGet packages. This was the only way to make development on a Mac a first class citizen.

But Microsoft went even further. Part of a great development experience is the editor of choice. Visual Studio was privileged to Windows users only. With Visual Studio Code Microsoft created a decent IDE for everyone now. Initially it was proprietary software but quickly became open source as well.

There are many more changes being made, but the common theme remains the same. Microsoft is dead serious about going open source and cross platform. Personally I think this is great. All of this is an amazing change and crucial to the long term success of ASP.NET.

ASP.NET Core 1.0 – Why did everything change?

One might wonder why this new direction towards the Mac and Linux community? Why does Microsoft invest so much money in attracting non-Windows developers? Visual Studio Code doesn’t cost them anything, it is unlikely that they will use MS SQL server in their projects and there is a high chance that these web applications will end up somewhere on a Linux box in Amazon Web Services or the Google Cloud Platform. After all these are the technologies which non-Windows users are more familiar with.

My guess is that all of this doesn’t matter for now. The truth is that an ASP.NET developer who cannot be monetized is still better than a non ASP.NET developer. This is particularly very true if you think that the .NET community is shrinking (relatively). This is just my own speculation, but I think Microsoft fears losing .NET developers, which means they are subsequently losing people who are more willing to pay for other Microsoft products such as MS SQL Server or Microsoft Azure.


If you are a .NET developer you might think this sounds crazy, but think of it from a different angle. Windows Desktop application development is slowly dying. There is no denial to that. Left is the mobile market and the web. Windows phones and tablets are still a drop on a hot stone in comparison to the market shares of iOS and Android. This leaves the web as a last resort. Now the web is an interesting one. After Silverlight’s death ASP.NET is the only Microsoft product which competes with other web technologies such as Node, Ruby, Python, Java and more. This is a though battle for ASP.NET, because up until now you had to be a Windows user to be able to develop web applications with ASP.NET.

Lack of portability

In the last few years this problem has become even more prominent with many new languages gaining more popularity and putting ASP.NET into the shadows.

The biggest problem is that the .NET framework and ASP.NET are not cross platform compatible. As a web developer you are writing applications which can be understood by any browser, any OS and any device which is connected to the web. There are no limitations, but with ASP.NET you can only develop from a Windows machine. That doesn’t make much sense when you think about it.

This limitation has an impact on the adoption of ASP.NET on several levels. Recruitment is a good example. There is a massive shortage of good software developers at the moment. Ask Ayende how hard it is to recruit a new talent. Imagine how much harder it is if you limit your talent pool to Windows users only? Not only do you waste more time and resources on the recruitment process itself, but also have to pay higher salaries for developers where the demand is higher than the supply.

It can be difficult for companies which are heavily committed to the .NET stack to change directions now, but what about startups? Many of today’s biggest internet businesses were born out of small startups. They use free open source technologies such as PHP, Ruby, Python, Java or Node.js. This has a double negative effect for Microsoft. Not only did they lose the opportunity to sell ASP.NET, but they also send out the message that if you want to build a successful business you pick an open stack over proprietary software.

ASP.NET is probably one of the feature richest and fastest technologies you can find, but why would a startup care about this in the beginning? If they do well they can deal with this stuff later and if it doesn’t go well then its good they didn’t have to pay for a Microsoft license, right?

Chasing behind innovation

Another major implication of not being cross platform compatible is that current ASP.NET 4.6 developers are missing out on big innovations which are not immediately available on the Windows platform. Over the last years Microsoft was chasing after many innovations by providing its own version to the .NET community, but not always with success (Silverlight, AppFabric Cache, DocumentDb, Windows Phone, etc.). This is not a sustainable model.

As a result many ASP.NET developers live in silos today. We are at a point where Microsoft cannot keep up with the vast amount of technology anymore and ASP.NET developers miss out on big innovations such as containers and Docker and don’t even realize it, because they know very little to nothing about it. This is a dangerous place to be.

Cross platform compatibility is more than just a fad. It is the key to innovation today and the only way to stay on top of the game!

So how does Classic ASP.NET fit into this new world? Not much to be honest. ASP.NET 4.6 has a really though time to keep up with this fast moving environment.

Except we have ASP.NET Core 1.0 now…

ASP.NET Core 1.0 – Reviving ASP.NET

This is where ASP.NET Core 1.0 comes into the limelight. It is built on the same core principles which helped other languages to popularity:

  • Free and open source
  • Cross platform compatible
  • Ease of access
  • Thin, fast, modular and extensible

On the plus side ASP.NET Core 1.0 can be developed with some of the greatest languages available right now, thinking of C# and F# in particular! This will stick out ASP.NET Core from other competitive frameworks.

What will happen to ASP.NET 4.6? I don’t know, but I would argue that ASP.NET 4.6 is a dead horse in the long run. There is very little value in betting any more money on it. Microsoft wouldn’t say this yet, but it is pretty obvious. ASP.NET Core 1.0 is the new successor and the only viable solution to address the aforementioned problems.

ASP.NET 4.6 will be soon remembered as Classic ASP.NET. It will not entirely disappear, just like Classic ASP has never fully disappeared, but new development will likely happen in ASP.NET Core going forward. I find it extremely exciting and the benefits of ASP.NET Core are too compelling to not switch over as soon as possible.

The only thing we need to hope for is that Microsoft will not become impatient now and mess up the release with an immature product which will cause more churn than attraction. Microsoft, please take the time to bake something to be proud of!