Cheap ASP.NET Core 1.0 ( ASP.NET 5 ) why it will replace Classic ASP.NET

CheapASPNETHostingReview.com | Cheap and Relibale ASP.NET Core 1.0 ( ASP.NET 5 ) hosting. ASP.NET Core 1.0 is not a continuation of ASP.NET 4.6. It is a whole new framework, a side-by-side project which happily lives alongside everything else we know. It is an actual re-write of the current ASP.NET 4.6 framework, but much smaller and a lot more modular.

Only recently Scott Hanselman announced the final name will be ASP.NET Core 1.0 after we’ve got to know it under ASP.NET 5, ASP.NET vNext and Project K.

Some people claim that many things remain the same, but this is not entirely true. Those people mostly refer to MVC 6 which is a whole separate framework which can be plugged into ASP.NET, but doesn’t have to. While MVC 6 remains very familiar, ASP.NET Core 1.0 is a big fundamental change to the ASP.NET landscape.

If you are a follower of the live community standups then you might have heard Damian Edwards saying how the team gets a lot of pressure (from above) to get an RTM out of the door. I am not surprised and can understand why ASP.NET Core 1.0 is strategically so important to Microsoft. It is probably a lot more vital to the future of .NET than we might think of it today.

ASP.NET Core 1.0 – What has changed?

A better question would be what has not changed. ASP.NET Core 1.0 is a complete re-write. There is no System.Web anymore and everything which came with it.

ASP.NET Core 1.0 is open source. It is also cross platform. Microsoft invests a lot of money and effort into making it truly cross platform portable. This means there is a new CoreCLR which is an alternative to Mono now. You can develop, build and run an ASP.NET Core 1.0 application either on Mono or the CoreCLR on a Mac, Linux or Windows machine. This also means that Windows technologies such as PowerShell are abandoned from ASP.NET Core 1.0. Instead Microsoft heavily integrates Node.js which can be utilized to run pre- and post build events with Grunt or Gulp.

It is also the reason why things like the .csproj file got replaced by the project.json file and why all the new framework libraries ship as NuGet packages. This was the only way to make development on a Mac a first class citizen.

But Microsoft went even further. Part of a great development experience is the editor of choice. Visual Studio was privileged to Windows users only. With Visual Studio Code Microsoft created a decent IDE for everyone now. Initially it was proprietary software but quickly became open source as well.

There are many more changes being made, but the common theme remains the same. Microsoft is dead serious about going open source and cross platform. Personally I think this is great. All of this is an amazing change and crucial to the long term success of ASP.NET.

ASP.NET Core 1.0 – Why did everything change?

One might wonder why this new direction towards the Mac and Linux community? Why does Microsoft invest so much money in attracting non-Windows developers? Visual Studio Code doesn’t cost them anything, it is unlikely that they will use MS SQL server in their projects and there is a high chance that these web applications will end up somewhere on a Linux box in Amazon Web Services or the Google Cloud Platform. After all these are the technologies which non-Windows users are more familiar with.

My guess is that all of this doesn’t matter for now. The truth is that an ASP.NET developer who cannot be monetized is still better than a non ASP.NET developer. This is particularly very true if you think that the .NET community is shrinking (relatively). This is just my own speculation, but I think Microsoft fears losing .NET developers, which means they are subsequently losing people who are more willing to pay for other Microsoft products such as MS SQL Server or Microsoft Azure.

If you are a .NET developer you might think this sounds crazy, but think of it from a different angle. Windows Desktop application development is slowly dying. There is no denial to that. Left is the mobile market and the web. Windows phones and tablets are still a drop on a hot stone in comparison to the market shares of iOS and Android. This leaves the web as a last resort. Now the web is an interesting one. After Silverlight’s death ASP.NET is the only Microsoft product which competes with other web technologies such as Node, Ruby, Python, Java and more. This is a though battle for ASP.NET, because up until now you had to be a Windows user to be able to develop web applications with ASP.NET.

Lack of portability

In the last few years this problem has become even more prominent with many new languages gaining more popularity and putting ASP.NET into the shadows.

The biggest problem is that the .NET framework and ASP.NET are not cross platform compatible. As a web developer you are writing applications which can be understood by any browser, any OS and any device which is connected to the web. There are no limitations, but with ASP.NET you can only develop from a Windows machine. That doesn’t make much sense when you think about it.

This limitation has an impact on the adoption of ASP.NET on several levels. Recruitment is a good example. There is a massive shortage of good software developers at the moment. Ask Ayende how hard it is to recruit a new talent. Imagine how much harder it is if you limit your talent pool to Windows users only? Not only do you waste more time and resources on the recruitment process itself, but also have to pay higher salaries for developers where the demand is higher than the supply.

It can be difficult for companies which are heavily committed to the .NET stack to change directions now, but what about startups? Many of today’s biggest internet businesses were born out of small startups. They use free open source technologies such as PHP, Ruby, Python, Java or Node.js. This has a double negative effect for Microsoft. Not only did they lose the opportunity to sell ASP.NET, but they also send out the message that if you want to build a successful business you pick an open stack over proprietary software.

ASP.NET is probably one of the feature richest and fastest technologies you can find, but why would a startup care about this in the beginning? If they do well they can deal with this stuff later and if it doesn’t go well then its good they didn’t have to pay for a Microsoft license, right?

Chasing behind innovation

Another major implication of not being cross platform compatible is that current ASP.NET 4.6 developers are missing out on big innovations which are not immediately available on the Windows platform. Over the last years Microsoft was chasing after many innovations by providing its own version to the .NET community, but not always with success (Silverlight, AppFabric Cache, DocumentDb, Windows Phone, etc.). This is not a sustainable model.

As a result many ASP.NET developers live in silos today. We are at a point where Microsoft cannot keep up with the vast amount of technology anymore and ASP.NET developers miss out on big innovations such as containers and Docker and don’t even realize it, because they know very little to nothing about it. This is a dangerous place to be.

Cross platform compatibility is more than just a fad. It is the key to innovation today and the only way to stay on top of the game!

So how does Classic ASP.NET fit into this new world? Not much to be honest. ASP.NET 4.6 has a really though time to keep up with this fast moving environment.

Except we have ASP.NET Core 1.0 now…

ASP.NET Core 1.0 – Reviving ASP.NET

This is where ASP.NET Core 1.0 comes into the limelight. It is built on the same core principles which helped other languages to popularity:

Free and open source
Cross platform compatible
Ease of access
Thin, fast, modular and extensible

On the plus side ASP.NET Core 1.0 can be developed with some of the greatest languages available right now, thinking of C# and F# in particular! This will stick out ASP.NET Core from other competitive frameworks.

What will happen to ASP.NET 4.6? I don’t know, but I would argue that ASP.NET 4.6 is a dead horse in the long run. There is very little value in betting any more money on it. Microsoft wouldn’t say this yet, but it is pretty obvious. ASP.NET Core 1.0 is the new successor and the only viable solution to address the aforementioned problems.

ASP.NET 4.6 will be soon remembered as Classic ASP.NET. It will not entirely disappear, just like Classic ASP has never fully disappeared, but new development will likely happen in ASP.NET Core going forward. I find it extremely exciting and the benefits of ASP.NET Core are too compelling to not switch over as soon as possible.

The only thing we need to hope for is that Microsoft will not become impatient now and mess up the release with an immature product which will cause more churn than attraction. Microsoft, please take the time to bake something to be proud of!

Cheap ASP.NET 5 hosting Configuration

CheapASPNETHostingReview.com | Cheap and reliable ASP.NET 5 hosting. Today I will share my article about ASP.NET 5 configuration. This is the third in a series of articles that explores ASP.NET 5 by reconstructing the Visual Studio 2015 Web Application template from an Empty template. This article looks at the new configuration system added to ASP.NET 5 and will also cover how services like Entity Framework and MVC itself are added to the project. The series of articles has been developed using Visual Studio RTM and ASP.NET 5 Beta 6. It will be kept updated along with newer releases.

Goodbye XML, Hello JSON

In the past, ASP.NET has been built on a foundation of XML. Web Forms .aspx and .ascx files are basically XML files and configuration in previous versions of ASP.NET is managed in an XML file called web.config. The web.config file has a particular structure and a class (System.Web.Configuration.WebConfigurationManager) devoted to providing access to it. In ASP.NET 5 JSON is the preferred format for storing structured information such as configuration. This change has largely been driven, I suspect, by the desire to appeal to web developers working on other platforms who are more used to JSON as a structured data format. The first article in this series has already looked at the new JSON solution and project files: global.json and project.json.

The default replacement for the web.config file is config.json. You can also choose to use an XML file if you prefer, and INI files, environment variables, command line arguments and an in-memory option are supported natively too. The template for a config.json file is labelled as ASP.NET Configuration File in the Add New Item dialog:

Cheap ASP.NET 5 Hosting Recommendation Click Here

When you add one, the templated content provides a placeholder for a connection string:

{
    "Data": {
        "DefaultConnection": {
            "ConnectionString": "Server=(localdb)\\MSSQLLocalDB;Database=_CHANGE_ME;Trusted_Connection=True;"
        }
    }
}

{

"Data": {

"DefaultConnection": {

"ConnectionString": "Server=(localdb)\\MSSQLLocalDB;Database=_CHANGE_ME;Trusted_Connection=True;"

}

Strongly Typed AppSettings

In earlier versions of ASP.NET, it is quite common to store application-wide constants in the appSettings section of a web.config file. You can store these values in the config.json file instead. Previous Beta release templates included an example of this, but it has been removed from the Beta 6 template. The steps described below demonstrate how to use the config.json file to store appsettings and how to provide strongly-typed access to them.

Add the highlighted code to the config.json file:

{
    "AppSettings" : {
        "SiteTitle" :  "My Web Site"
    },
    "Data": {
        "DefaultConnection": {
            "ConnectionString": "Server=(localdb)\\MSSQLLocalDB;Database=_CHANGE_ME;Trusted_Connection=True;"
        }
    }
}

{

"AppSettings" : {

"SiteTitle" : "My Web Site"

"Data": {

"DefaultConnection": {

"ConnectionString": "Server=(localdb)\\MSSQLLocalDB;Database=_CHANGE_ME;Trusted_Connection=True;"

}

Right click on the Properties node in Solution Explorer (depicted by a wrench icon) and select Add » New Item.
Add a C# class file named AppSettings.cs and replace its default content with the following:

namespace WebApplication2
{
    public class AppSettings
    {
        public string SiteTitle { get; set; }
    }
}

namespace WebApplication2

{

public class AppSettings

{

public string SiteTitle { get; set; }

}

Change the dependencies section in project.json to include the highlighted lines below

 "dependencies": {
    "Microsoft.AspNet.Server.IIS": "1.0.0-beta6",
    "Microsoft.AspNet.Server.WebListener": "1.0.0-beta6",
    "Microsoft.AspNet.Mvc": "6.0.0-beta6",
    "Microsoft.Framework.Configuration.Json": "1.0.0-beta6"
  },

"dependencies": {

"Microsoft.AspNet.Server.IIS": "1.0.0-beta6",

"Microsoft.AspNet.Server.WebListener": "1.0.0-beta6",

"Microsoft.AspNet.Mvc": "6.0.0-beta6",

"Microsoft.Framework.Configuration.Json": "1.0.0-beta6"

Make the following highlighted changes to Startup.cs:

using Microsoft.AspNet.Builder;
using Microsoft.AspNet.Hosting;
using Microsoft.AspNet.Http;
using Microsoft.Framework.Configuration;
using Microsoft.Framework.DependencyInjection;
using Microsoft.Framework.OptionsModel;
using Microsoft.Framework.Runtime;

namespace WebApplication2
{
    public class Startup
    {
        public IConfiguration Configuration { get; set; }

        public Startup(IHostingEnvironment env, IApplicationEnvironment appEnv)
        {
            var builder = new ConfigurationBuilder(appEnv.ApplicationBasePath)
                .AddJsonFile("config.json");
            Configuration = builder.Build();
        }
        public void ConfigureServices(IServiceCollection services)
        {
            services.Configure<AppSettings>(Configuration.GetConfigurationSection("AppSettings"));
            services.AddMvc();
        }

        public void Configure(IApplicationBuilder app)
        {
            var appSettings = app.ApplicationServices.GetService<IOptions<AppSettings>>();
            app.Run(async (context) =>
            {
                await context.Response.WriteAsync(appSettings.Options.SiteTitle);
            });
        }
    }
}

using Microsoft.AspNet.Builder;

using Microsoft.AspNet.Hosting;

using Microsoft.AspNet.Http;

using Microsoft.Framework.Configuration;

using Microsoft.Framework.DependencyInjection;

using Microsoft.Framework.OptionsModel;

using Microsoft.Framework.Runtime;

namespace WebApplication2

{

public class Startup

{

public IConfiguration Configuration { get; set; }

public Startup(IHostingEnvironment env, IApplicationEnvironment appEnv)

{

var builder = new ConfigurationBuilder(appEnv.ApplicationBasePath)

.AddJsonFile("config.json");

Configuration = builder.Build();

}

public void ConfigureServices(IServiceCollection services)

{

services.Configure<AppSettings>(Configuration.GetConfigurationSection("AppSettings"));

services.AddMvc();

}

public void Configure(IApplicationBuilder app)

{

var appSettings = app.ApplicationServices.GetService<IOptions<AppSettings>>();

app.Run(async (context) =>

{

await context.Response.WriteAsync(appSettings.Options.SiteTitle);

});

}

Press Ctrl+F5 to run the application without debugging. You should see “My Web Site” written to the browser.

You started by adding a new section called AppSettings to the config.json file and declaring a property with a value. Then you created a C# class called AppSettings with one property that matches the one you added to the config file. The AppSettings class is designed to provide strongly typed access to the appSettings section of the config.json file. You added a couple of packages to the project.json file to make them available to the application. The first package enables you to use JSON as the format for your configuration data. The second package introduces MVC into the application.

Cheap ASP.NET 5 Hosting Recommendation Click Here

In the Startup class, you added a constructor where you instantiated a variable representing the project’s configuration as the config.json file and assigned that to a property that you created of type IConfiguration. This holds the values loaded from the configuration source (the config.json file). You made the AppSettings available to the application by registering it with the dependency injection system in the ConfigureServices method. The method you used mapped the json values from the configuration file to the AppSettings class. You also registered the MVC framework with the dependency injection system. Finally, you used the GetService<T> extension method to retrieve the AppSettings from the DI system in the Startup class’sConfigure method where you used them to write the SiteTitle value to the browser.

Summary
The configuration model introduced with ASP.NET 5 is a world away from the one in previous versions of ASP.NET. It is a plug and play system that supports various data formats (JSON, XML, INI files) out of the box. You can also write your own configuration providers to cater for alternative formats. This article looked at the default JSON format and saw how to add new sections. It also covered how to reference the values in the new section in a strongy typed manner through the use of Options. You saw how to make the configuration available as a service which you registered with the built-in Dependency Injection system. In the next article, I will explore dependency injection in ASP.NET 5 in more detail.

Cheap ASP.NET Core 1.0 Hosting Recommendation

CheapASPNETHostingReview.com | Cheap and Reliable ASP.NET Core 1.0 Hosting recommendation. Somedays ago Microsoft announced that what has so far been ASP.NET 5.0 has been renamed to ASP.NET Core 1.0. Microsoft went this route and made it very clear that this version of ASP.NET is a totally new platform to build applications from and not just a small upgrade as prior upgrades from say ASP.NET 3 to 4 have been. ASP.NET Core is a brand new platform that has been rebuilt from the ground up – all the way to the core .NET platform libraries – to provide a leaner and cross platform implementation on what was ASP.NET. While there is a lot of feature compatibility with older versions, it does not have what you would call code compatibility meaning that you can’t just run your old ASP.NET code in ASP.NET Core without a fair bit of change.

What is ASP.NET Core 1.0?

ASP.NET Core 1.0 is a new open-source and cross-platform framework for building modern cloud-based Web applications using .NET. We built it from the ground up to provide an optimized development framework for apps that are either deployed to the cloud or run on-premises. It consists of modular components with minimal overhead, so you retain flexibility while constructing your solutions. You can develop and run your ASP.NET Core 1.0 applications cross-platform on Windows, Mac and Linux. ASP.NET Core 1.0 is fully open source on GitHub.

With ASP.NET Core 1.0 we are making a number of architectural changes that make the core web framework much leaner and more modular. ASP.NET Core 1.0 is no longer based on System.Web.dll, but is instead based on a set of granular and well factored NuGet packages allowing you to optimize your app to have just what you need. You can reduce the surface area of your application to improve security, reduce your servicing burden and also to improve performance in a true pay-for-what-you-use model.

Cheap ASP.NET Core 1.0 Hosting Recommendation

After doing ASP.NET development for years, we have used many asp.net hosting services in our projects. Best ASP.NET Hosting below are the cheap ASP.NET Core 1.0 Hosting in our list, who offer their customers with fast & reliable solutions at an affordable price.

ASPHostPortal.com - Cheap ASP.NET Core 1.0 Hosting

ASPHostPortal

^$1.00

Host Intro

/mo

Host 1 Site

1 GB Disk Space

10 GB Bandwidth

0 SQL Server db

SQL Server 2008/2012/2014

0 MB SQL Server / db

0 MySQL db

0 MB MySQL /db

50 MB Email Space

ASPHostPortal

^$5.00

Host One

/mo

Host Unlimited Sites

5 GB Disk Space

60 GB Bandwidth

2 SQL Server db

SQL Server 2008/2012/2014

200 MB SQL /db

3 MySQL db

200 MB MySQL /db

200 MB Email Space

ASPHostPortal

^$9.00

Host Two

/mo

Host Unlimited Sites

15 GB Disk Space

150 GB Bandwidth

4 SQL Server db

SQL Server 2008/2012/2014

500 MB SQL / db

6 MySQL db

500 MB MySQL /db

500 MB Email Space

ASPHostPortal

^$14.00

Host Three

/mo

Host Unlimited Sites

50 GB Disk Space

500 GB Bandwidth

6 SQL Server db

SQL Server 2008/2012/2014

1000 MB SQL / db

10 MySQL db

1000 MB MySQL /db

1000 MB Email Space

Choose the Cheap Web Hosting for ASP.NET

The site is designed to help people find the best and cheap ASP.NET Core 1.0 hosting solution at an affordable price. All above ASP.NET hosting providers are Microsoft Golden Hosting partners, which means your websites will be hosted in a server which are maintained by a group of Microsoft experts. And their price are also affordable to most people. So, to choose the right one for your site.

ASPHostPortal.com

ASPHostPortal.com is one of the leading providers of ASP.NET Core 1.0 hosting services for providing complete strategy to your cyber problems concerning web hosting, e-commerce and cloud hosting working throughout 24×7. This year group commemorates 10 years of the successful existence. The most important plays a part in this success happen to be authentic and relevant solutions of questions pertaining with web, service of experts, friendly customer services and finally the final although not least reasonable charges for qualitative services.

The key reason utilizing web hosting services of ASPHostPortal.com is it provides consistent and protective web hosting services through the use of beautifully shaped data centre that results severance and backup system up to 100%. Every one of these services are finished by team of professionals who are experts in their respective fields and are dedicated to deliver better of remarkable ability.

However, most of them would realize later that finding the cheap ASP.NET Core 1.0 hosting is not as simple as finding a reliable shared hosting. So how people can choose their web hosting? In addition to company reputation, speed & uptime performance into consideration, people should also check the following factors carefully.

Operating System

At present, both Windows Server 2012 and Windows Server 2008 are perfect operating systems for ASP.NET hosting. Integrated with IIS 7.0/7.5/8.0, they have excellent support for .NET and ASP.NET MVC. If the hosting solution does not offer Windows Server 2012 or 2008, people really have to think twice before signing up.

Trust Level

Normally, ASP.NET trust level directly determines what permission an ASP.NET website has in a server. Ensure the hosting provider supports full (at latest medium) trust level so people could use and install almost any web applications without troubles.

.NET Framework

Choosing a great ASP.NET hosting, it is quite important that the hosting solution contains the newest and most stable .NET framework like ASP.NET 2/3.5SP1/4.5/5 that can assure people run any programs, and avoid compatible issues.

ASP.NET MVC

ASP.NET MVC is an open source web application framework that implements the MVC (model-view-controller) pattern, which uses interface-based contracts allowing each component to be easily tested independently. But not every web host offers this great feature, people would be better ensure it is included when selecting ASP.NET hosting.

Control Panel & Support Service

For ASP.NET hosting, Plesk is the most suitable and easy-to-use control panel that is able to meet the requirement of users. Some hosts also offer WebsitePanel or self-developed control panel to customers

Simpan