Cheap ASP.NET Core 1.0 Hosting Comparison ASPHostPortal VS Intervolve

ASP.NET web hosting is designed for running the websites developed by Microsoft ASP.NET technology and databases based on Windows server platform. We don’t suggest you host ASP.NET applications on Apache web server in Linux although Mono provides that capability. Because running websites in Microsoft technology on Microsoft platform is performance and reliability guaranteed.

CheapASPNETHostingReview.com | Best and cheap ASP.NET Core 1.0 hosting comparison. Finding the best and cheap ASP.NET hosting provider is not easy at all, its really crucial for your web application. May your ASP.NET can only run smooth if it will be hosted on server which can provide you with a higher uptime and so on. But you know, there’s a thousand web hosting provider’s which offer ASP.NET hosting.

How to find The Best and Cheap ASP.NET Core 1.0 Hosting ?

I’m sure this question always be in your mind. Choosing and finding the best and cheap ASP.NET Core 1.0 hosting provider is a time consuming task, to make your buying decision easy you can read review first and compare it after that you can conclude 2 best yet cheap ASP.NET hosting which are reliable and offer affordable ASP.NET Hosting so that everyone can afford it.

To help you choose the best and cheap ASP.NET Core 1.0 hosting we will compare 2 hosting company who offer reliable ASP.NET Core 1.0 hosting. In order to make right and inform decisions when looking for a suitable windows ASP.NET hosting Service that will be relevan with your needs, here our recommendation of Best and Cheap ASP.NET Core 1.0 hosting providers.

ASPHostPortal VS Intervolve

Rating	Intervolve	ASPHostPortal
Plan in Comparison	Lite	Host One
Reliability
Price
Feature
Speed
Technical Support

Intervolve was established in 1998 and has since served a broad range of industries including IT, medicine & healthcare, construction, manufacturing, tourism, retail, education, community organisations, as well as Government Agencies and Departments. On the other hand, ASPHostPortal, as a professional web host, puts everything on offering premium Windows and Linux hosting service. According to the recent market research, as for ASP.NET hosting, ASPHostPortal takes more advantageous places.

This time we would like to work out a comprehensive comparison of this web hosts to figure out whether ASPHostPortal really have strengths to win Intervolve for a long term. After testing two hosting plans from the two web hosting providers, we compare Intervolve with ASPHostPortal from several aspects, including pricing, feature, uptime, speed and technical support. To begin with, please refer to the following rating table.

Comparison Pricing and Plan

Intervolve offers five web hosting package, Lite, Bronze, Silver, Gold and Platinum. The price starts from $120/year, $240/year, $360/year, $480/year until $660/year. For each new Windows Plesk website hosting package purchased, they provide a free .com, .net, or .org domain name at time of your order. You are also free to BYO domain, if you already have this registered elsewhere.

ASPHostPortal have 8 plans for their Windows ASP.NET hosting that fully support ASP.NET hosting, named Host Intro, Host One until Host Seven. Which are price from $1.00/mo until $70.00/mo regulary.

Cheap ASP.NET Core 1.0 Hosting Comparison Feature

To evaluate whether a web hosting provider is a worthwhile choice, feature is an indispensable point. Below is a comparison between the features of Intervolve and ASPHostPortal. At Intervolve, we select the single site package to be compared with hosts one package offered by ASPHostPortal.

Feature	Intervolve	ASPHOSTPORTAL
Plan in Comparison	Lite	Host One
Price	$120.00/year	$5.00/mo
Number of Site	1	Unlimited
FTP
Daily Backup
PHP
MySQL
DB Backup and Restore
phpMyAdmin
Email Account

Cheap ASP.NET Hosting Comparison Uptime and Speed

In the past monitoring days, Intervolve delivery 99.95% uptime, which fails to fulfill its 99.99% uptime guarantee. On the contrary, ASPHostPortal reaches its 100% guarantee perfectly reaching its uptime guarantee. The success of ASPHostPortal results from its world-class data centers, latest technologies and many engineers’ commitments.

ASPHostPortal has multiple data centers in (US (Washington & Seattle), Netherlands (Amsterdam), Singapore, Hong Kong, United Kingdom (London), Australia (Melbourne), France (Paris), Germany (Frankfurt), Italy (Milan), India (Chennai), Canada (Toronto), Brazil (Sao Paulo)).You can be rest assured that your websites or dedicated servers are secured, managed and monitored in a state-of-the-art facility, and as a customer you have access to their engineers and the most reliable Support team.

Cheap ASP.NET Hosting Comparison Technical Support

Both ASPHostPortal and Intervolve hire many professional hosting engineers and technicians, as a helpful technical support team, to help customers solve the problems. Moreover, both of them offer many platforms and channels, such as Knowledgebase and blog, for customers to handle issues by themselves or ask other experienced users for help.

Summary

Even though ASPHostPortal and Intervolve both have various ASP.NET hosting plans to satisfy different webmasters with different need, the former dose the better job based on the comparison above. Specifically, from the content above, it is apparent that ASPHostPortal, specializing in ASP.NET hosting, offers more cost-effective feature, reliable performance and thoughtful customer service.

MOST HIGHLY RECOMMENDED ” We highly recommended ASPHostPortal to host your ASP.NET Core 1.0 hosting. ASPHostPortal.com is offer reliable and affordable windows ASP.NET hosting service, they have four plans, Host Intro, Host one , Host Two anda Host Three. The price starting from $1.00/mo – $14.00/mo. You can buying ASPHostPortal Windows ASP.NET Core 1.0 hosting plan for as low as $1.00/month also you can get FREE Cloud Hosting click here

Who we are ?

We write review to help bloggers, web masters and beginners who desire to choosing a quality , affordable and excellent web hosting package. We write some detailed review, tips and tutorials in order to help you successfully create and manage your web hosting account also help you to choose the best yet cheap ASP.NET hosting which are reliable and offer affordable ASP.NET Hosting so that everyone can afford it.

Cheap ASP.NET Core 1.0 Hosting

ASP.NET is great for building standards-based websites with HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript. ASP.NET supports three approaches for making web sites.

CheapASPNETHostingReview.com | Best and cheap ASP.NET Core 1.0 hosting. ASP.NET is one of the most popular hosting solution by Microsoft, its price is a little bit higher, which also makes it hard to find a best and cheap ASP.NET hosting. In below, but in here we have list out a list of best and cheap ASP.NET hosting who surpass the other web hosts on ASP.NET features, price, server performance, reliability, and support.

Cheap ASP.NET Core 1.0 Hosting

After review 30 + More Best and cheap ASP.NET Core 1.0 hosting we found Top 3 as the best and cheap ASP.NET Core 1.0 hosting, ASPHostportal, HostForLIFE and DiscountService are named as web hosting who offer reliable and affordable ASP.NET hosting in 2016. From them, you can find high quality Windows based hosting to host your ASP.NET websites.

ASPHostPortal

$4.49

Feature

/mo with 15% OFF

Host Unlimited Sites

5 GB Disk Space

60 GB Bandwidth

2 SQL Server db

SQL 2008/2012/2014

SQL Server 2016

200 MB SQL Server / db

3 MySQL db

200 MB MySQL /db

200 MB Email Space

HostForLIFE

€3.49

Feature

/mo with 15% OFF

Unlimited Domain

Unlimited Disk Space

Unlimited Bandwidth

2 MSSQL DB

500 MB MSSQL Space/DB

MSSQL 2008/2012/2014

MSSQL 2016

2 MySQL DB

500 MB MySQL Space/DB

500 MB Email Space

DiscountService

$2.99

Feature

/mo with 35% OFF

Host Unlimited Sites

2 GB Disk Space

20 GB Bandwidth

1 SQL Server

SQL 2008/2012/2014

SQL 2016

100 MB SQL Server / db

1 MySQL

100 MB MySQL /db

500 MB Email Space

Best ASP.NET Hosting – ASPHostPortal.com

Founded in 2008 and provides Windows web hosting services. This company currently supports the latest ASP.NET hosting. With the 5+ years development and growth, ASPHostPortal has accumulated rich experience and has become a large web hosting providers over the Internet. ASPHostPortal.com provides an affordable and high quality ASP.NET hosting

ASPHostPortal offers various shared hosting plans. But, we will discuss their famous plan here. This company offers several additional add-ons that you can purchase after your base plan has been setup via the control panel.

The company provides 24/7 US-based technical support via email and live chat. Thus, customers can contact the experts immediately. What’s more, the company has promised that the first response time is in 2 minutes, which averages under 30 seconds in the real world. The support staffs of ASPHostPortal are all well-trained to resolve any technical problems effectively. Therefore, there is no need to worry about the capability of these people.

Besides, multiple FAQs are included in the section of Community Q&A, which provide people with the solutions for some common issues specifically. The Guides & Whitepapers offers multiple useful tutorials for site building.

Fast ASP.NET Core 1.0 Hosting – HostForLIFE

HostForLIFE was founded in 2008 and since then they have grown into one of the largest windows hosting companies in the UK. HostForLIFE is operated from their registered office based in Manchester and data center in Amsterdam and the newest London data center. At HostForLIFE you will find low cost, yet reliable, windows hosting services. Today they host millions of websites across their infrastructure. From entry level Shared Hosting packages all the way up to Private Clusters.

The company offers Windows hosting specifically to their clients. They support various programming language such as ASP.NET which is their specialization, MSSQL, PHP, MySQL, PHPMyadmin, and other programming languages. HostForLIFE windows hosting offers services to different kinds of people. HostForLIFE windows hosting offers users unlimited bandwidth, disk space, hosted domains, MSSQL databases, MySQL databases, FTP accounts, unlimited add on domains, unlimited parked and sub domains, unlimited POP3 accounts, unlimited e-mail alias. All these are designed to offer their clients great and high quality services along with ensuring that their need are well catered for. These robust features are what has made HostForLIFE windows hosting among the leading windows hosting

Premium ASP.NET Core 1.0 Hosting

DiscountService.biz, a new Windows Hosting company in the hosting field, strives to offer premium ASP.NET hosting service with concrete actions. Although this is a young company, DiscountService.biz offers reliable ASP.NET hosting in Australia, unbeatable Microsoft technologies, a big investment on data centers and the around-the-clock technical support.

DiscountService.biz is focused on ASP.NET hosting service. Up to now, many facts prove that this company is a good choice. This time we work out a review to analyze that whether this company has real strengths and highlights to gain customers’ trusts for a long term and to go through the test of time. In order to answer all doubts, we have taken over 100 feedbacks from customers that use their hosting services. Please see the details below for more information

DiscountService.biz has a professional technical support team which is 24/7 available to offer customer full-round and responsive customer service. Usually, consumers can ask for solutions via email and ticketing system. Besides, this company promises to respond all the customers with satisfactory answers in a short time.

DiscountService.biz has a team of technicians who are experienced and skilled in Windows hosting staying on-site day and night to offer support for troubled customers. The company guarantees that responses are given in the fastest time possible and all problems can receive a complete solution within 24 hours.

Simpan

Cheap ASP.NET Core 1.0 Hosting Tutorial – How To Create Smart Links Using TagHelpers in ASP.NET Core 1.0

CheapASPNETHostingReview.com | Best and cheap ASP.NET Core 1.0 hosting. In this post we will discuss about using TagHelpers in ASP.NET core 1.0. Well as you know the latest release of ASP.NET MVC has a new feature called TagHelpers. Let’s see what trouble we can get into today by creating hyperlinks that think for themselves.

For example, when you want to create a home link the users can navigate back to th[kkstarratings]e home page. Using TagHelpers, a simple one would look like this:

<a asp-controller="Home" asp-action="Index" title="Back to home page">Home Page</a>

1	<a asp-controller="Home" asp-action="Index" title="Back to home page">Home Page</a>

These attributes are part of the TagHelper classes “shipped” with the latest ASP.NET MVC 6 source code. Then when you run your web app, the LinkTagHelper renders out to this :

<a title="Back to home page" href="/">Home Page</a>

1	<a title="Back to home page" href="/">Home Page</a>

What’s Available?

Currently, there are 12 TagHelpers available to get you started. They are:

AnchorTagHelper – Render a hyperlink
CacheTagHelper – Allows you to wrap HTML code and implement various caching methods on that HTML.
EnvironmentTagHelper – Renders different HTML based on a test vs. staging vs. production environment.
FormTagHelper – Render a standard HTML form.
ImageTagHelper – Render an image.
LabelTagHelper – Render a Label
LinkTagHelper – Render a <link> tag for CSS files.
OptionTagHelper – Renders an <option> tag for a <select> (dropdown) tag.
ScriptTagHelper – Renders a <script> tag for JavaScripts in the header or body.
SelectTagHelper – Render a <select> (dropdown) tag.
ValidationMessageTagHelper – Render a message for input validation
ValidationSummaryTagHelper – Render out a Summary of all validations that didn’t pass when the form was submitted.

These come with ASP.NET MVC 6 right out of the box and ready to use.

How To Creating a Custom TagHelper

Make a “Fingerprint

Created a brand new ASP.NET MVC 6 project and selected the ASP.NET 5 Preview in 2015.
Created a TagHelper folder in the root of the project.
Created a new class called SmartLinkHelper and started thinking about this SmartLink class.

First off, we don’t need to exert ourselves when we already have an AnchorTagHelper available.

Let’s use that.

[TargetElement("a", Attributes = SmartLinkAttributeName)]
public class SmartLinkHelper: AnchorTagHelper
{
    private const string SmartLinkAttributeName = "smart-link";
}

[TargetElement("a", Attributes = SmartLinkAttributeName)]

public class SmartLinkHelper: AnchorTagHelper

{

private const string SmartLinkAttributeName = "smart-link";

}

Every TagHelper has to have a “fingerprint” so .NET can identify the tags it needs to render. The fingerprint for our SmartLink is the anchor tag (‘a’) and a “smart-link” attribute. Our smart link will have the following signature:

<a smart-link href="http://www.cnn.com/">Valid Link (to cnn.com)</a>

1	<a smart-link href="http://www.cnn.com/">Valid Link (to cnn.com)</a>

Everything will be the same for our anchor tags, but we will add a “smart-link” attribute to identify it to .NET on which class to call when rendering our smart link. You can even define your own custom tag.

We need to add a Url attribute for external sites.

[TargetElement("a", Attributes = SmartLinkAttributeName)]
public class SmartLinkHelper: AnchorTagHelper
{
    private const string SmartLinkAttributeName = "smart-link";
    public SmartLinkHelper(IHtmlGenerator generator) : base(generator) { }

    [HtmlAttributeName("href")]
    public string Url { get; set; }

[TargetElement("a", Attributes = SmartLinkAttributeName)]

public class SmartLinkHelper: AnchorTagHelper

{

private const string SmartLinkAttributeName = "smart-link";

public SmartLinkHelper(IHtmlGenerator generator) : base(generator) { }

[HtmlAttributeName("href")]

public string Url { get; set; }

Any property in your TagHelper class can become an attribute. All you need to do is place the HtmlAttributeName attribute on your property with a name of the attribute and you’re ready to go.

We Need Process!

Once we set up everything, the TagHelper needs a way to kick off the rendering process. This is where the Process and/or ProcessAsync methods come into play.

The Process and ProcessAsync methods take two parameters: a TagHelperContext and a TagHelperOutput.

TagHelperContext contains all of the attributes and details about the tag that we’re working with in this TagHelper.
TagHelperOutput is the buffer of what will be rendered to the browser. Think TagBuilder from a HtmlHelper.

Here is what we have so far with our ProcessAsync method.

public override async Task ProcessAsync(TagHelperContext context, TagHelperOutput output)
{
    // Grab the content inside the anchor tag.
    var child = await context.GetChildContentAsync();
    var content = child.GetContent();
    // Get the status of the page.
    var statusCode = await GetStatusCode();
    
    // If we get a 404, remove the link.
    if (statusCode == HttpStatusCode.NotFound ||
        statusCode == HttpStatusCode.InternalServerError)
    {
        RemoveLink(output, content);
        // Log a bad link or site if you want.
        return;
    }
    MergeAttributes(context, output);
    // Business as usual
    await base.ProcessAsync(context, output);
}

public override async Task ProcessAsync(TagHelperContext context, TagHelperOutput output)

{

// Grab the content inside the anchor tag.

var child = await context.GetChildContentAsync();

var content = child.GetContent();

// Get the status of the page.

var statusCode = await GetStatusCode();

// If we get a 404, remove the link.

if (statusCode == HttpStatusCode.NotFound ||

statusCode == HttpStatusCode.InternalServerError)

{

RemoveLink(output, content);

// Log a bad link or site if you want.

return;

}

MergeAttributes(context, output);

// Business as usual

await base.ProcessAsync(context, output);

}

First, we grab the content inside the anchor tags. This is considered your “Content.”

Next, we perform an HttpClient Asynchronous request to the webpage and return the status code. We check to see if we have an internal server error (500) or the page wasn’t found (404). If we have either of those, we remove the link.

If we don’t have an error, we continue along grabbing all of the attributes on our new smart link tag and merge them.

Finally, we return the link.

To the View!

When implementing your TagHelpers in your Views, you need to include an @addTagHelper with the base TagHelper class and your project’s tag helper (My project is called SmartLinksDemo). These need to be at the top of your page

@addTagHelper "*, Microsoft.AspNet.Mvc.TagHelpers"
@addTagHelper "*, SmartLinksDemo"

1 2	@addTagHelper ", Microsoft.AspNet.Mvc.TagHelpers" @addTagHelper ", SmartLinksDemo"

I also added this HTML to the bottom just for a simple demonstration.

<hr/>
<div class="row">
    <div class="col-md-12">
        <h2>Smart Link Demo</h2>
        <ul>
            <a title="Back to home page" href="/">Home Page</a>
            <li><a asp-controller="Home" asp-action="Index" title="Back to home page">Home Page</a></li>
            <li><a smart-link href="http://www.cnn.com/">Valid Link (to cnn.com)</a></li>
            <li><a smart-link href="javascript:void(0);">Bad Link on purpose</a></li>
        </ul>
    </div>
</div>

<hr/>

<h2>Smart Link Demo</h2>

<ul>

<li><a smart-link href="http://www.cnn.com/">Valid Link (to cnn.com)</a></li>

<li><a smart-link href="javascript:void(0);">Bad Link on purpose</a></li>

</ul>

</div>

Once you have this HTML included in your View, you are ready to test out your SmartLink TagHelper.

Finish it!

Here is our final SmartLink TagHelper.

[TargetElement("a", Attributes = SmartLinkAttributeName)]
public class SmartLinkHelper: AnchorTagHelper
{
    private const string SmartLinkAttributeName = "smart-link";
    public SmartLinkHelper(IHtmlGenerator generator) : base(generator) { }
    [HtmlAttributeName("href")]
    public string Url { get; set; }
    public override async Task ProcessAsync(TagHelperContext context, TagHelperOutput output)
    {
        // Grab the content inside the anchor tag.
        var child = await context.GetChildContentAsync();
        var content = child.GetContent();
        // Get the status of the page.
        var statusCode = await GetStatusCode();
        
        // If we get a 404, remove the link.
        if (statusCode == HttpStatusCode.NotFound ||
            statusCode == HttpStatusCode.InternalServerError)
        {
            RemoveLink(output, content);
            // Log a bad link or site if you want.
            return;
        }
        MergeAttributes(context, output);
        // Business as usual
        await base.ProcessAsync(context, output);
    }
    private static void MergeAttributes(TagHelperContext context, TagHelperOutput output)
    {
        // Merge the attributes and remove the smart-link and activate attributes.
        var attributesToKeep = context.AllAttributes
            .Where(e => e.Name != SmartLinkAttributeName)
            .ToList();
        if (!attributesToKeep.Any()) return;
        var attributes = context.AllAttributes.Except(attributesToKeep);
        foreach (var readOnlyTagHelperAttribute in attributes)
        {
            output.Attributes.Add(new TagHelperAttribute
            {
                Name = readOnlyTagHelperAttribute.Name,
                Value = readOnlyTagHelperAttribute.Value,
                Minimized = readOnlyTagHelperAttribute.Minimized
            });
        }
    }
    private static void RemoveLink(TagHelperOutput output, string content)
    {
        output.PreContent.SetContent(String.Empty);
        output.TagName = "";
        output.Content.SetContent(content);
        output.PostContent.SetContent(String.Empty);
    }
    private async Task<HttpStatusCode> GetStatusCode()
    {
        try
        {
            using (var client = new HttpClient())
            {
                var msg = new HttpResponseMessage();
                await client.GetAsync(Url);
                return msg.StatusCode;
            }
        }
        catch
        {
            return HttpStatusCode.InternalServerError;
        }
    }
}

[TargetElement("a", Attributes = SmartLinkAttributeName)]

public class SmartLinkHelper: AnchorTagHelper

{

private const string SmartLinkAttributeName = "smart-link";

public SmartLinkHelper(IHtmlGenerator generator) : base(generator) { }

[HtmlAttributeName("href")]

public string Url { get; set; }

public override async Task ProcessAsync(TagHelperContext context, TagHelperOutput output)

{

// Grab the content inside the anchor tag.

var child = await context.GetChildContentAsync();

var content = child.GetContent();

// Get the status of the page.

var statusCode = await GetStatusCode();

// If we get a 404, remove the link.

if (statusCode == HttpStatusCode.NotFound ||

statusCode == HttpStatusCode.InternalServerError)

{

RemoveLink(output, content);

// Log a bad link or site if you want.

return;

}

MergeAttributes(context, output);

// Business as usual

await base.ProcessAsync(context, output);

}

private static void MergeAttributes(TagHelperContext context, TagHelperOutput output)

{

// Merge the attributes and remove the smart-link and activate attributes.

var attributesToKeep = context.AllAttributes

.Where(e => e.Name != SmartLinkAttributeName)

.ToList();

if (!attributesToKeep.Any()) return;

var attributes = context.AllAttributes.Except(attributesToKeep);

foreach (var readOnlyTagHelperAttribute in attributes)

{

output.Attributes.Add(new TagHelperAttribute

{

Name = readOnlyTagHelperAttribute.Name,

Value = readOnlyTagHelperAttribute.Value,

Minimized = readOnlyTagHelperAttribute.Minimized

});

}

private static void RemoveLink(TagHelperOutput output, string content)

{

output.PreContent.SetContent(String.Empty);

output.TagName = "";

output.Content.SetContent(content);

output.PostContent.SetContent(String.Empty);

}

private async Task<HttpStatusCode> GetStatusCode()

{

try

{

using (var client = new HttpClient())

{

var msg = new HttpResponseMessage();

await client.GetAsync(Url);

return msg.StatusCode;

}

catch

{

return HttpStatusCode.InternalServerError;

}

Conclusion

TagHelpers are slowly growing on me. I was skeptical at first whether they would be a benefit to me or not, but I would consider TagHelpers to be the WebControls from the WebForm days and even consider them on the same level as Angular Directives where you can create your own HTML tags.

However, with that said, TagHelpers can be loaded controls. If you wanted to build a <grid> TagHelper, there is nothing stopping you from creating a new WebGrid control, but there would be a LOT of code behind the scenes to generate a webgrid.

Cheap Windows ASP.NET Core 1.0 Hosting with Best Service

CheapASPNETHostingReview.com | Cheap and reliable Windows ASP.NET Core 1.0 hosting. Nowdays finding the best and cheap ASP.NET hosting provider is not easy at all, its really crucial for your web application. May your ASP.NET can only run smooth if it will be hosted on server which can provide you with a higher uptime and so on. But you know, there’s a thousand web hosting provider’s which offer ASP.NET hosting.

How to find The Best and Cheap Windows ASP.NET Hosting ?

I’m sure this question always be in your mind. Choosing and finding the best and cheap ASP.NET hosting provider is a time consuming task, to make your buying decision easy you can read review first and compare it after that you can conclude 2 best yet cheap ASP.NET hosting which are reliable and offer affordable ASP.NET Hosting so that everyone can afford it.

Cheap Windows ASP.NET Core 1.0 Hosting Recommendation

After review and compared 50 + more ASP.NET hosting provider we found 2 the Best and Cheap ASP.NET hosting company.

In order to make right and inform decisions when looking for a suitable windows ASP.NET hosting Service that will be relevan with your needs, here our recommendation of Best and Cheap ASP.NET Core 1.0 hosting providers.

ASPHostPortal

$5.00

ASP.NET Core 1.0

/mo

Host Unlimited Sites

5 GB Disk Space

60 GB Bandwidth

2 SQL Server db

SQL Server 2008/2012/2014

SQL Server 2016

200 MB SQL Server / db

3 MySQL db

200 MB MySQL /db

200 MB Email Space

HostForLIFE

€5.50

ASP.NET Core 1.0

/mo

Unlimited Domain

Unlimited Disk Space

Unlimited Bandwidth

2 MSSQL DB

500 MB MSSQL Space/DB

MSSQL 2008/2012/2014

MSSQL 2016

2 MySQL DB

500 MB MySQL Space/DB

500 MB Email Space

MOST HIGHLY RECOMMENDED ” We highly recommended ASPHostPortal to host your ASP.NET Core 1.0 hosting. ASPHostPortal.com is offer reliable and affordable windows ASP.NET hosting service, they have four plans, Host Intro, Host one , Host Two anda Host Three. The price starting from $1.00/mo – $14.00/mo. You can buying ASPHostPortal Windows ASP.NET Core 1.0 hosting plan for as low as $1.00/month also you can get FREE Cloud Hosting click here

When someone start to searching on internet about the best and cheap ASP.NET hosting provider , I’m sure in the end you can getting confused with web hosting price, feature, service, server location, support and may things.

Who we are ?

We write review to help bloggers, web masters and beginners who desire to choosing a quality , affordable and excellent web hosting package. We write some detailed review, tips and tutorials in order to help you successfully create and manage your web hosting account also help you to choose the best yet cheap ASP.NET hosting which are reliable and offer affordable ASP.NET Hosting so that everyone can afford it.

How Should you choose the Best and Cheap ASP.NET Core 1.0 hosting ?

Your application runs smooth when you choose a good quality ASP.NET hosting provided. The best web hosting is one which can offer you with a quality web hosting service 99.99% uptime, high bandwidht, plenty of server space, 24/7 costumer support and money back guarantee. You can following this point while choosing the best and cheap ASP.NET hosting company for your website.

99.99% Server Uptime
24/7 Email and chat
Unlimited or a Decent Disk Space
Plesk Control Panel
Affordable Pricing
Unlimited Bandwidth
Full trust
Website Builder
Free Website Templates
Money back guarantee
A Good Rating by Customers

CheapASPNETHostingReview.com is a proffesional web hosting review website to help people find the best web hosting at the lowest price available.We receive conpensation from web hosting compoanies whose products we review. We’re unbiased while review the web hosting so that you can take a right decision but still we encourage you to scrutinize the companies listed on this website

Simpan

Cheap ASP.NET Core 1.0 Hosting Tutorial – Tips to Send Emails in ASP.NET Core 1.0

CheapASPNETHostingReview.com | Cheap and reliable ASP.NET core 1.0 Hosting. ASP.NET Core 1.0 is a reboot of the ASP.NET framework which can target the traditional full .NET framework or the new .NET Core framework. Together ASP.NET Core and .NET Core have been designed to work cross platform and have a lighter, faster footprint compared to the current full .NET framework. Many of the .NET Core APIs are the same as they are in the full framework and the team have worked hard to try and keep things reasonably similar where it makes sense and is practical to do so. However, as a consequence of developing a smaller, more modular framework of dependant libraries and most significantly making the move to support cross platform development and hosting; some of libraries have been lost. Take a look at this post from Immo Landwerth which describes the changes in more detail and discusses considerations for porting existing applications to .NET Core.

As with most coding challenges I jumped straight onto Google to see who else had had this requirement and how they solved the problem. However I didn’t find as many documented solutions that helped me as I was expecting to. Eventually I landed on this issue within the corefx repo on Github. That led me onto the MailKit library maintained by Jeffrey Stedfast and it turned out to be a great solution for me as it has recently been updated to work on .NET Core.

In this post I will take you through how I got this working for the two scenarios I needed to tackle. Firstly sending mail directly via an SMTP relay and secondly the possibility to save the email message into an SMTP pickup folder. Both turned out to be pretty painless to get going.

Adding MailKit to your Project

The first step is to add the reference to the NuGet package for MailKit. I now prefer to use the project.json file directly to setup my dependencies. You’ll need to add the MailKit library – which is at version 1.3.0-beta6 at the time of writing this post – to your dependencies section in the project.json file.

On a vanilla ASP.NET Core web application your dependencies should look like this:

Once you save the change VS should trigger a restore of the necessary NuGet packages and their dependencies.

Sending email via a SMTP server

I tested this solution in a default ASP.NET Core web application project which already includes an IEmailSender interface and a class AuthMessageSender which just needs implementing. It was an obvious choice for me to test the implementation using this class as DI is already hooked up for it. For this post I’ll show the bare bones code needed to get started with sending emails via an SMTP server.

To follow along, open up the MessageServices.cs file in your web application project.

We need three using statements at the top of the file.

using MailKit.Net.Smtp;
using MimeKit;
using MailKit.Security;

The SendEmailAsync method can now be updated as follows:

public async Task SendEmailAsync(string email, string subject, string message)
{
    var emailMessage = new MimeMessage();
 
    emailMessage.From.Add(new MailboxAddress("Joe Bloggs", "jbloggs@example.com"));
    emailMessage.To.Add(new MailboxAddress("", email));
    emailMessage.Subject = subject;
    emailMessage.Body = new TextPart("plain") { Text = message };
 
    using (var client = new SmtpClient())
    {
        client.LocalDomain = "some.domain.com";               
        await client.ConnectAsync("smtp.relay.uri", 25, SecureSocketOptions.None).ConfigureAwait(false);
        await client.SendAsync(emailMessage).ConfigureAwait(false);
        await client.DisconnectAsync(true).ConfigureAwait(false);
    }
}

public async Task SendEmailAsync(string email, string subject, string message)

{

var emailMessage = new MimeMessage();

emailMessage.From.Add(new MailboxAddress("Joe Bloggs", "jbloggs@example.com"));

emailMessage.To.Add(new MailboxAddress("", email));

emailMessage.Subject = subject;

emailMessage.Body = new TextPart("plain") { Text = message };

using (var client = new SmtpClient())

{

client.LocalDomain = "some.domain.com";

await client.ConnectAsync("smtp.relay.uri", 25, SecureSocketOptions.None).ConfigureAwait(false);

await client.SendAsync(emailMessage).ConfigureAwait(false);

await client.DisconnectAsync(true).ConfigureAwait(false);

}

First we declare a new MimeMessage object which will represent the email message we will be sending. We can then set some of it’s basic properties.

The MimeMessage has a “from” address list and a “to” address list that we can populate with our sender and recipient(s). For this example I’ve added a single new MailboxAddress for each. The basic constructor for the MailboxAddress takes in a display name and the email address for the mailbox. In my case the “to” mailbox takes the address which is passed into the SendEmailAsync method by the caller.

We then add the subject string to the email message object and then define the body. There are a couple of ways to build up the message body but for now I’ve used a simple approach to populate the plain text part using the message passed into the SendEmailAsync method. We could also populate a Html body for the message if required.

That leaves us with a very simple email message object, just enough to form a proof of concept here. The final step is to send the message and to do that we use a SmtpClient. Note that this isn’t the SmtpClient from system.net.mail, it is part of the MailKit library.

We create an instance of the SmtpClient wrapped with a using statement to ensure that it is disposed of when we’re done with it. We don’t want to keep connections open to the SMTP server once we’ve sent our email. You can if required (and I have done in my code) set the LocalDomain used when communicating with the SMTP server. This will be presented as the origin of the emails. In my case I needed to supply the domain so that our internal testing SMTP server would accept and relay my emails.

We then asynchronously connect to the SMTP server. The ConnectAsync method can take just the uri of the SMTP server or as I’ve done here be overloaded with a port and SSL option. For my case when testing with our local test SMTP server no SSL was required so I specified this explicitly to make it work.

Finally we can send the message asynchronously and then close the connection. At this point the email should have been fired off via the SMTP server.

Sending email via a SMTP pickup folder

As I mentioned earlier I also had a requirement to drop a message into a SMTP pickup folder running on the web server rather than sending it directly through the SMTP server connection. There may well be a better way to do this (I got it working in my test so didn’t dig any deeper) but what I ended up doing was as follows:

public async Task SendEmailAsync(string email, string subject, string message)
{
    var emailMessage = new MimeMessage();
 
    emailMessage.From.Add(new MailboxAddress("Joe Bloggs", "jbloggs@example.com"));
    emailMessage.To.Add(new MailboxAddress("", email));
    emailMessage.Subject = subject;
    emailMessage.Body = new TextPart("plain") { Text = message };
 
    using (StreamWriter data = System.IO.File.CreateText("c:\\smtppickup\\email.txt"))
    {
        emailMessage.WriteTo(data.BaseStream);
    }
}

public async Task SendEmailAsync(string email, string subject, string message)

{

var emailMessage = new MimeMessage();

emailMessage.From.Add(new MailboxAddress("Joe Bloggs", "jbloggs@example.com"));

emailMessage.To.Add(new MailboxAddress("", email));

emailMessage.Subject = subject;

emailMessage.Body = new TextPart("plain") { Text = message };

using (StreamWriter data = System.IO.File.CreateText("c:\\smtppickup\\email.txt"))

{

emailMessage.WriteTo(data.BaseStream);

}

The only real difference from my earlier code was the removal of the use of SmtpClient. Instead, after generating my email message object I create a steamwriter which creates a text file on a local directory. I then used the MimeMessage.WriteTo method passing in the base stream so that the RFC822 email message file is created in my pickup directory. This is picked up and sent via the smtp system.

Summing Up

MailKit seems like a great library and it’s solved my immediate requirements. There are indications that the Microsoft team will be working on porting their own SmtpClient to support ASP.NET Core at some stage but it’s great that the community have solved the problem for those adopting / testing .NET Core now.

Cheap ASP.NET Core 1.0 Hosting Choice

CheapASPNETHostingReview.com | Cheap and reliable ASP.NET Core 1.0 Hosting. ASPHostPortal , HostForLIFE and DiscountService are recommended as the top 3 cheap ASP.NET core 1.0 hosting providers based on our reviews. They have exceeded their competitors not only on ASP.NET pricing, but also on features, reliability, speed and customer support. Going with them, customers can build up a Windows-based website easily at an affordable price.

To make things clean and simple, we have made out the following straightforward table of those three hosting companies from some of the referred aspects, including price, extras, hosting features and customer support. More details are presented as below.

Cheap ASP.NET Core 1.0 Hosting Choice

Rank	Company	Price	Feature
1	ASPHostPortal.com	$5.00/mo	Windows 2012/IIS8.5 Unlimited Sites Plesk panel MSSQL 2012 Express ASP.NET Core 1.0, MVC, Silverlight, URLRewrite2, WebMatrix 30 Days Money Back Guaranted To learn more, visit http://asphostportal.com
2	HostForLIFE.eu	$€3.00/mo	Windows 2012 R2/IIS 8.5 MSSQL 2012 Express Full trust level Remote IIS & MSSQL ASP.NET core 1.0, MVC, Silverlight, URLRewrite2, WebMatrix Microsoft certificated 24×7 technical support To learn more, visit http://hostforlife.eu
3	DiscountService.biz	$7.00/mo	Windows 2012/IIS8.0 Customized CP MSSQL 2012 Express 30 day money back FULL trusted hosting Isolated application pool ASP.NET core 1.0 , MVC 4/5, Silverlight 4/5 To learn more, visit http://discountservice.biz

Best Cheap ASP.NET Core 1.0 Hosting

ASPHostPortal.com delivers essentially the most technologically sophisticated hosting options obtainable to clients across the planet. Safety, reliability, and functionality are in the core of their hosting operations to ensure every single web site and/or application hosted on servers is extremely secured and performs at optimum level.

They have more than 10 years combined knowledge with.NET, PHP, Network Administration, Technique Integration and related technologies to support mission vital hosting for applications constructed on these platforms. Their service is trusted worldwide and have served far more than 10,000 buyers in five different continents.

Causes Why Consumers Trust Their Site at ASPHostPortal.com

Excellent Uptime Price
Their essential strength in delivering the service to you is always to sustain server uptime price. They never ever ever pleased to find out your website goes down and truly realize that it’ll hurt your onlines enterprise. In case your service is down, it’ll certainly become their pain and can certainly try to find the best pill to kill the discomfort ASAP.
Uptime & Support Guarantees
They are so confident in hosting services, they will not only provide you with a 30 days money back guarantee, but also give you a 99.9% uptime guarantee.
A Powerful User-Friendly Control Panel
Their Control Panel provides the tools and utilities, which give you true control over your account and web pages.
Setup Installation
They’ll get you up and running within 30 seconds of placing your order.

Personal ASP.NET Hosting

HostForLIFE.eu is offering a free ASP.NET Core 1.0 hosting for all Windows shared hosting. For their cheap plan is only from €3.00 a month with incredible features and outstanding support. One click Script installer to install all your favorite ASP, PHP and Javascript/Ajax scripts. Daily backup also included with all shared hosting packages. Their robust, shared hosting plan with super speed and adequate allocated resources. Very suitable for individuals, college students and businesses which need good response time without compromising quality. For their paid service, They also give you Uptime and 30 Days money back guarantee.

Experienced ASP.NET Hosting

DiscountService.biz guarantees the highest top quality solution, prime safety, and unshakeable reliability. We carefully chose high-quality servers, networking, and infrastructure gear to make sure the utmost reliability.

They focus on offering cost-effective Windows shared hosting. That’s all they do and which is all they’ll ever do. Their new Windows 2008 / Windows 2012 hosting platform is excellent for the ASP.NET hosting needs and in case you’ll need support on Windows 2003 Hosting Platform, they still support it!

With their completely support on Microsoft Windows and ASP.NET, they’re the top option to host your MojoPortal Hosting. The following are a few of the causes why clients choose them as ASP.NET core 1.0 Hosting provider:

World Class Control Panel
They use Globe Class Plesk Control Panel that help one-click installation.
Quickly and Safe Server
The minimal specs of their servers involves Intel Xeon Dual Core Processor, RAID-10 protected hard disk space with minimum eight GB RAM. You dont want to worry regarding the speed of one’s web site.
Amazing Assistance Team
Their support team is extremely fast and may help you with establishing and employing ASP.NET Core 1.0 hosting on your account

Cheap ASP.NET Core 1.0 ( ASP.NET 5 ) why it will replace Classic ASP.NET

CheapASPNETHostingReview.com | Cheap and Relibale ASP.NET Core 1.0 ( ASP.NET 5 ) hosting. ASP.NET Core 1.0 is not a continuation of ASP.NET 4.6. It is a whole new framework, a side-by-side project which happily lives alongside everything else we know. It is an actual re-write of the current ASP.NET 4.6 framework, but much smaller and a lot more modular.

Only recently Scott Hanselman announced the final name will be ASP.NET Core 1.0 after we’ve got to know it under ASP.NET 5, ASP.NET vNext and Project K.

Some people claim that many things remain the same, but this is not entirely true. Those people mostly refer to MVC 6 which is a whole separate framework which can be plugged into ASP.NET, but doesn’t have to. While MVC 6 remains very familiar, ASP.NET Core 1.0 is a big fundamental change to the ASP.NET landscape.

If you are a follower of the live community standups then you might have heard Damian Edwards saying how the team gets a lot of pressure (from above) to get an RTM out of the door. I am not surprised and can understand why ASP.NET Core 1.0 is strategically so important to Microsoft. It is probably a lot more vital to the future of .NET than we might think of it today.

ASP.NET Core 1.0 – What has changed?

A better question would be what has not changed. ASP.NET Core 1.0 is a complete re-write. There is no System.Web anymore and everything which came with it.

ASP.NET Core 1.0 is open source. It is also cross platform. Microsoft invests a lot of money and effort into making it truly cross platform portable. This means there is a new CoreCLR which is an alternative to Mono now. You can develop, build and run an ASP.NET Core 1.0 application either on Mono or the CoreCLR on a Mac, Linux or Windows machine. This also means that Windows technologies such as PowerShell are abandoned from ASP.NET Core 1.0. Instead Microsoft heavily integrates Node.js which can be utilized to run pre- and post build events with Grunt or Gulp.

It is also the reason why things like the .csproj file got replaced by the project.json file and why all the new framework libraries ship as NuGet packages. This was the only way to make development on a Mac a first class citizen.

But Microsoft went even further. Part of a great development experience is the editor of choice. Visual Studio was privileged to Windows users only. With Visual Studio Code Microsoft created a decent IDE for everyone now. Initially it was proprietary software but quickly became open source as well.

There are many more changes being made, but the common theme remains the same. Microsoft is dead serious about going open source and cross platform. Personally I think this is great. All of this is an amazing change and crucial to the long term success of ASP.NET.

ASP.NET Core 1.0 – Why did everything change?

One might wonder why this new direction towards the Mac and Linux community? Why does Microsoft invest so much money in attracting non-Windows developers? Visual Studio Code doesn’t cost them anything, it is unlikely that they will use MS SQL server in their projects and there is a high chance that these web applications will end up somewhere on a Linux box in Amazon Web Services or the Google Cloud Platform. After all these are the technologies which non-Windows users are more familiar with.

My guess is that all of this doesn’t matter for now. The truth is that an ASP.NET developer who cannot be monetized is still better than a non ASP.NET developer. This is particularly very true if you think that the .NET community is shrinking (relatively). This is just my own speculation, but I think Microsoft fears losing .NET developers, which means they are subsequently losing people who are more willing to pay for other Microsoft products such as MS SQL Server or Microsoft Azure.

If you are a .NET developer you might think this sounds crazy, but think of it from a different angle. Windows Desktop application development is slowly dying. There is no denial to that. Left is the mobile market and the web. Windows phones and tablets are still a drop on a hot stone in comparison to the market shares of iOS and Android. This leaves the web as a last resort. Now the web is an interesting one. After Silverlight’s death ASP.NET is the only Microsoft product which competes with other web technologies such as Node, Ruby, Python, Java and more. This is a though battle for ASP.NET, because up until now you had to be a Windows user to be able to develop web applications with ASP.NET.

Lack of portability

In the last few years this problem has become even more prominent with many new languages gaining more popularity and putting ASP.NET into the shadows.

The biggest problem is that the .NET framework and ASP.NET are not cross platform compatible. As a web developer you are writing applications which can be understood by any browser, any OS and any device which is connected to the web. There are no limitations, but with ASP.NET you can only develop from a Windows machine. That doesn’t make much sense when you think about it.

This limitation has an impact on the adoption of ASP.NET on several levels. Recruitment is a good example. There is a massive shortage of good software developers at the moment. Ask Ayende how hard it is to recruit a new talent. Imagine how much harder it is if you limit your talent pool to Windows users only? Not only do you waste more time and resources on the recruitment process itself, but also have to pay higher salaries for developers where the demand is higher than the supply.

It can be difficult for companies which are heavily committed to the .NET stack to change directions now, but what about startups? Many of today’s biggest internet businesses were born out of small startups. They use free open source technologies such as PHP, Ruby, Python, Java or Node.js. This has a double negative effect for Microsoft. Not only did they lose the opportunity to sell ASP.NET, but they also send out the message that if you want to build a successful business you pick an open stack over proprietary software.

ASP.NET is probably one of the feature richest and fastest technologies you can find, but why would a startup care about this in the beginning? If they do well they can deal with this stuff later and if it doesn’t go well then its good they didn’t have to pay for a Microsoft license, right?

Chasing behind innovation

Another major implication of not being cross platform compatible is that current ASP.NET 4.6 developers are missing out on big innovations which are not immediately available on the Windows platform. Over the last years Microsoft was chasing after many innovations by providing its own version to the .NET community, but not always with success (Silverlight, AppFabric Cache, DocumentDb, Windows Phone, etc.). This is not a sustainable model.

As a result many ASP.NET developers live in silos today. We are at a point where Microsoft cannot keep up with the vast amount of technology anymore and ASP.NET developers miss out on big innovations such as containers and Docker and don’t even realize it, because they know very little to nothing about it. This is a dangerous place to be.

Cross platform compatibility is more than just a fad. It is the key to innovation today and the only way to stay on top of the game!

So how does Classic ASP.NET fit into this new world? Not much to be honest. ASP.NET 4.6 has a really though time to keep up with this fast moving environment.

Except we have ASP.NET Core 1.0 now…

ASP.NET Core 1.0 – Reviving ASP.NET

This is where ASP.NET Core 1.0 comes into the limelight. It is built on the same core principles which helped other languages to popularity:

Free and open source
Cross platform compatible
Ease of access
Thin, fast, modular and extensible

On the plus side ASP.NET Core 1.0 can be developed with some of the greatest languages available right now, thinking of C# and F# in particular! This will stick out ASP.NET Core from other competitive frameworks.

What will happen to ASP.NET 4.6? I don’t know, but I would argue that ASP.NET 4.6 is a dead horse in the long run. There is very little value in betting any more money on it. Microsoft wouldn’t say this yet, but it is pretty obvious. ASP.NET Core 1.0 is the new successor and the only viable solution to address the aforementioned problems.

ASP.NET 4.6 will be soon remembered as Classic ASP.NET. It will not entirely disappear, just like Classic ASP has never fully disappeared, but new development will likely happen in ASP.NET Core going forward. I find it extremely exciting and the benefits of ASP.NET Core are too compelling to not switch over as soon as possible.

The only thing we need to hope for is that Microsoft will not become impatient now and mess up the release with an immature product which will cause more churn than attraction. Microsoft, please take the time to bake something to be proud of!

Cheap ASP.NET Core 1.0 Hosting Recommendation

CheapASPNETHostingReview.com | Cheap and Reliable ASP.NET Core 1.0 Hosting recommendation. Somedays ago Microsoft announced that what has so far been ASP.NET 5.0 has been renamed to ASP.NET Core 1.0. Microsoft went this route and made it very clear that this version of ASP.NET is a totally new platform to build applications from and not just a small upgrade as prior upgrades from say ASP.NET 3 to 4 have been. ASP.NET Core is a brand new platform that has been rebuilt from the ground up – all the way to the core .NET platform libraries – to provide a leaner and cross platform implementation on what was ASP.NET. While there is a lot of feature compatibility with older versions, it does not have what you would call code compatibility meaning that you can’t just run your old ASP.NET code in ASP.NET Core without a fair bit of change.

What is ASP.NET Core 1.0?

ASP.NET Core 1.0 is a new open-source and cross-platform framework for building modern cloud-based Web applications using .NET. We built it from the ground up to provide an optimized development framework for apps that are either deployed to the cloud or run on-premises. It consists of modular components with minimal overhead, so you retain flexibility while constructing your solutions. You can develop and run your ASP.NET Core 1.0 applications cross-platform on Windows, Mac and Linux. ASP.NET Core 1.0 is fully open source on GitHub.

With ASP.NET Core 1.0 we are making a number of architectural changes that make the core web framework much leaner and more modular. ASP.NET Core 1.0 is no longer based on System.Web.dll, but is instead based on a set of granular and well factored NuGet packages allowing you to optimize your app to have just what you need. You can reduce the surface area of your application to improve security, reduce your servicing burden and also to improve performance in a true pay-for-what-you-use model.

Cheap ASP.NET Core 1.0 Hosting Recommendation

After doing ASP.NET development for years, we have used many asp.net hosting services in our projects. Best ASP.NET Hosting below are the cheap ASP.NET Core 1.0 Hosting in our list, who offer their customers with fast & reliable solutions at an affordable price.

ASPHostPortal.com - Cheap ASP.NET Core 1.0 Hosting

ASPHostPortal

^$1.00

Host Intro

/mo

Host 1 Site

1 GB Disk Space

10 GB Bandwidth

0 SQL Server db

SQL Server 2008/2012/2014

0 MB SQL Server / db

0 MySQL db

0 MB MySQL /db

50 MB Email Space

ASPHostPortal

^$5.00

Host One

/mo

Host Unlimited Sites

5 GB Disk Space

60 GB Bandwidth

2 SQL Server db

SQL Server 2008/2012/2014

200 MB SQL /db

3 MySQL db

200 MB MySQL /db

200 MB Email Space

ASPHostPortal

^$9.00

Host Two

/mo

Host Unlimited Sites

15 GB Disk Space

150 GB Bandwidth

4 SQL Server db

SQL Server 2008/2012/2014

500 MB SQL / db

6 MySQL db

500 MB MySQL /db

500 MB Email Space

ASPHostPortal

^$14.00

Host Three

/mo

Host Unlimited Sites

50 GB Disk Space

500 GB Bandwidth

6 SQL Server db

SQL Server 2008/2012/2014

1000 MB SQL / db

10 MySQL db

1000 MB MySQL /db

1000 MB Email Space

Choose the Cheap Web Hosting for ASP.NET

The site is designed to help people find the best and cheap ASP.NET Core 1.0 hosting solution at an affordable price. All above ASP.NET hosting providers are Microsoft Golden Hosting partners, which means your websites will be hosted in a server which are maintained by a group of Microsoft experts. And their price are also affordable to most people. So, to choose the right one for your site.

ASPHostPortal.com

ASPHostPortal.com is one of the leading providers of ASP.NET Core 1.0 hosting services for providing complete strategy to your cyber problems concerning web hosting, e-commerce and cloud hosting working throughout 24×7. This year group commemorates 10 years of the successful existence. The most important plays a part in this success happen to be authentic and relevant solutions of questions pertaining with web, service of experts, friendly customer services and finally the final although not least reasonable charges for qualitative services.

The key reason utilizing web hosting services of ASPHostPortal.com is it provides consistent and protective web hosting services through the use of beautifully shaped data centre that results severance and backup system up to 100%. Every one of these services are finished by team of professionals who are experts in their respective fields and are dedicated to deliver better of remarkable ability.

However, most of them would realize later that finding the cheap ASP.NET Core 1.0 hosting is not as simple as finding a reliable shared hosting. So how people can choose their web hosting? In addition to company reputation, speed & uptime performance into consideration, people should also check the following factors carefully.

Operating System

At present, both Windows Server 2012 and Windows Server 2008 are perfect operating systems for ASP.NET hosting. Integrated with IIS 7.0/7.5/8.0, they have excellent support for .NET and ASP.NET MVC. If the hosting solution does not offer Windows Server 2012 or 2008, people really have to think twice before signing up.

Trust Level

Normally, ASP.NET trust level directly determines what permission an ASP.NET website has in a server. Ensure the hosting provider supports full (at latest medium) trust level so people could use and install almost any web applications without troubles.

.NET Framework

Choosing a great ASP.NET hosting, it is quite important that the hosting solution contains the newest and most stable .NET framework like ASP.NET 2/3.5SP1/4.5/5 that can assure people run any programs, and avoid compatible issues.

ASP.NET MVC

ASP.NET MVC is an open source web application framework that implements the MVC (model-view-controller) pattern, which uses interface-based contracts allowing each component to be easily tested independently. But not every web host offers this great feature, people would be better ensure it is included when selecting ASP.NET hosting.

Control Panel & Support Service

For ASP.NET hosting, Plesk is the most suitable and easy-to-use control panel that is able to meet the requirement of users. Some hosts also offer WebsitePanel or self-developed control panel to customers

Simpan